Scented Wax Melts Create Particles in Indoor Air That ‘You Shouldn’t Be Breathing In’: 'Comparable to Diesel Engines'

Main Article: https://people.com/scented-wax-melts-create-particles-you-shouldn-t-breathe-in-11681024

Scientific Study: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00986

Fig. 1. The figure shows a wax warmer setup with wax melting in the center. (Image obtained from https://gardentherapy.ca/herbal-wax-melts/) 

    Atmospheric nanoparticles are tiny particles or droplets suspended in the air, typically measuring less than 100 nanometers in diameter. These particles originate from both natural sources, such as sea spray, volcanic eruptions, and wildfires, and human-made sources like vehicle emissions, industrial processes, and fossil fuel combustion. Due to their small size and large surface area, atmospheric nanoparticles play a significant role in climate dynamics and human health. They can influence cloud formation, affect the Earth's balance by scattering and absorbing sunlight, and contribute to the formation of acid rain. 

    Aerosol chemistry refers to the complex interactions between these particles and gases in the atmosphere. Aerosol particles can undergo chemical reactions with water vapor, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and other pollutants, producing secondary aerosols and contributing to smog and particulate matter that can harm respiratory systems. Studying the chemistry of aerosols is essential for understanding their environmental and health impacts, as well as their role in atmospheric processes like cloud formation and climate change. Aromatherapy is a well-known trend that has taken the world by storm, and essential oils are the primary source of the scents used. These essential oils are typically comprised of concentrated chemical extracts from plants; chemicals like terpenes will be talked about later in the scientific study. Many different diffusion methods exist for these oils, such as candles, wall scents, and wax melts. 

    In an article posted by People Magazine, the author highlights the dangers of scented wax melts. A recent study published in Environmental Science & Technology Letters has revealed that scented wax melts can generate indoor air pollution levels comparable to those produced by diesel engines. The research indicates that terpenes (the chemical compounds responsible for the fragrances in wax melts) react with existing ozone in indoor environments, forming significant particulate pollution. This finding suggests that while wax melts may seem like a healthier alternative to scented candles, they can still contribute substantially to indoor air pollution. The study emphasizes the importance of indoor air quality in building design and HVAC system operations to mitigate potential health risks associated with such pollutants.

    The study published in Environmental Science & Technology Letters was conducted by a research group from Purdue University. In this study, they simulated a "test house" to replicate most modern homes. Several instruments were utilized to demonstrate secondary aerosol formation, including a high-resolution particle size magnifier-scanning mobility particle sizer (PSMPS) and a proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer (PTR-TOF-MS). It was found that the terpenes released by max melts are comparable to those released by candles, gas stoves, and diesel engines. Specifically, the terpenes are said to react with atmospheric ozone and initiate new particle formation that increases nanoparticle concentrations by 10^6 cm-3. This challenges the claim that wax melts pose less threat than combustion-based aromatherapy. 


Fig. 2. (a) Representative time-resolved evaluation of indoor atmospheric nucleation and growth (NPF) during the use of bergamot-scented wax melts (two cubes) in the Purdue zEDGE test house at two different outdoor air ventilation rates [kvent values of 3.0 h−1 (top) and 6.5 h−1(bottom)]. (b) Relationship between the effective terpene ozonolysis rates [Keff·(MT + MTD)·O3] and particle nucleation rates at the critical diameter (J1.75) (left y-axis), along with mean condensational growth rates for particles in the size range of 3 nm < dem < 10 nm (right y-axis) during NPF events initiated by scented wax melts. Legend: zEDGE6.5, scented wax melts used in the zEDGE test house at a kvent of 6.5 h−1; zEDGE3.0, scented wax melts used in the zEDGE test house at a kvent of 3.0 h−1; CLOUDa, particle nucleation rates (J1.7) from ref 24; AURAb, particle nucleation rates (J1.7) from ref 28; CLOUD c, particle nucleation rates (J1.7) from ref 29; CLOUDd, apparent particle growth rates (3.2 nm < dem < 8nm) from ref 30. (c) Comparison of size-integrated sub-10 nm atmospheric nanoparticle number concentrations from scented wax melt use (this study) vs. scented candle combustion (ref 31), gas stove combustion (Gas Stove a, indoor bulk air measurements from ref 12; Gas Stoveb, cookstove emissions hood measurements from ref 32), diesel engine (exhaust emission measurements at 75% engine load from ref 33), and natural gas engine(exhaust emission measurements, where the value represents the mean, calculated from the engine operating under both lower- and higher-torque conditions, from ref 34). The error bars for this study and for Gas Stove-a represent the 25th and 75th percentile values, whereas for the diesel engine, they represent the values at 50% and 100% engine loads. For the natural gas engine, the error bars correspond to the values under lower and higher-torque operating conditions. (Pulled from Environmental Science & Technology Letters pubs.acs.org/journal/estlcu Letterhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00986Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2025, 12, 175−182176)

    The most important issue this study highlights is the unexpected and significant impact of scented wax melts on indoor air quality.  This poses potential health risks, especially in poorly ventilated indoor environments, as inhaling fine particulate matter has been linked to respiratory and cardiovascular issues. The study, however, lacks the need for greater awareness of indoor air pollution sources and improved ventilation strategies to mitigate these risks. It brings to question what other commonly used aerosols are used in poorly ventilated areas. Or, as an even greater worry, how much of these newly formed particles are being released into our atmosphere. 

    The People Magazine article does a great job of taking all this information and picking out the main components. However, it lacks a more extensive discussion of the study's implications. It goes through how the study was conducted and the conclusions drawn. Still, it mostly glosses over all the important data to support these claims and, more importantly, what they could mean for the overall health of people and our environment. 

    I would give this article a 6 out of 10, mainly due to the short length and being primarily comprised of direct quotes. In my opinion, this article is a super easy read and has an eye-catching title. It does a great job of explaining the chemistry behind terpenes and gives an easy-to-understand layout of how the study was conducted. It mentions possible solutions for all of these added particles, such as adding HVAC systems into building design. It further helps the issue of aerosols and how they can affect our environment. This could lead people to look more into aerosols and their potential impacts on human and atmospheric health. 


Comments

  1. This article effectively highlights the air pollution concerns associated with wax melts, candles, and other at-home pollutant sources. While the study focuses on wax melts, I think it would have been more comprehensive to also include essential oil diffusers, given their popularity and frequent use in aromatherapy. I hope future research will expand on this by comparing a broader range of scent-diffusing methods—including candles, diffusers, incense, and wax melts—to provide a more realistic assessment of their relative pollution levels and particle emissions. Additionally, while both sources reference the comparison between wax melts and diesel exhaust, this framing appears more attention-grabbing than informative and perhaps distracting. It may lead the reader to question what else might pollute as much as a diesel engine, considering wax melts are compared. A stir fry dinner? Burnt popcorn out of the microwave? I think it would be important to point out in the People article that while particle count and size may be similar in this comparison, composition is still very different. Solid choice on the paper.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I completely agree! I think diffusers share the same problem and more research needs to be done on how those particles are affecting our health. I also agree that the People article may be causing more panic by not fully explaining the specific particles being examined.

      Delete
  2. The title is eye-catching, but the media article is not giving solid proof to justify. It makes me feel that this article is written by a candle vendor for commercial purposes rather than scientific reasons. The hazard of those nano particles from scented wax melts should be confirmed prior to the conclusion of astounding indoor air pollution, otherwise the “pollution” is nonsense.
    Except for that, the scientific paper does enlighten readers that any pollutant’s concentration indoors could reach a very high level due to the limited space, therefore ventilation is necessary to keep healthy. Moreover, you can’t be too careful when using any chemical without checking its SDS.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really liked your post and article choice! I agree that the aerosols and PM emitted from these wax melts and other aromatics can be more damaging than people realize. Do you think there are any alternatives (besides better ventilation/HVAC) more so regarding the products themselves that could be used in place of the wax melts?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am honestly not sure of any different alternatives to wax melts. Compared to burning candles, it is the better of the two, only due to smoke/soot inhalation from the open flame. There has been talk about using better filters and other ventilation to remove the excess particles, but nothing along the lines of different alternatives. I would suggest not using as many scented aerosols, but I also understand loving a good-smelling home.

      Delete
  4. I feel like we really throw the work "pollution" around a lot, and it feels like a buzzword. Is "pollution" or "pollutant" specifically defined? Is it related to "contamination"?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree that pollution seems to be a buzzword these days. But, it could also lead to more people being interested in how all these particles are forming and how they could effect our atmosphere and human health.

      Delete
  5. This article effectively summarizes the study in an accessible manner but lacks in discussing the broader implications of these findings. While it talks about indoor air quality concerns, it primarily relies on direct quotes and does not fully explore the environmental or regulatory consequences of the study. I was not able to find any large scale environmental impact this study has.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The title is compelling, and I truly appreciate your post. This article raises concerns about the reactivity of terpenes and the potential reactions they may undergo with indoor emissions from building materials like plywood and carpets, which are known sources of formaldehyde. Understanding these interactions and their impact on human health is crucial. Also, this article highlights the importance of proper ventilation and raises valuable awareness in indoor air quality management.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It seems that indoor air pollution is more complex than we thought, and many everyday products are quietly affecting our health. I never expected scented wax melts to have such a significant impact on indoor air quality! I'm really curious—how long do these particles remain in the air? Are they more harmful than typical indoor air pollutants?

    ReplyDelete
  8. This article was really eye-opening! I've never thought about the airborne products from wax melts before, but it makes sense how the particulate matter can react with other air species to produce higher nanoparticle concentrations. I wonder what the long term effects of these melts are? Or if the different scents themselves have varying impacts?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I wonder the same thing. I also have a cat, and I notice that when I have certain scents on/around me, my cat will avoid me or sneeze more. It is also worth mentioning that animals tend to have stronger senses of smell. I wonder how much more these particles affect their respiratory system.

    ReplyDelete
  10. wow this is really shocking topic. THanks for sharing with us. I think the paper should talk a little about how these particles stay in the air. I remember that in the class our professor talks about the duration of how particle falls on the ground, is really related to its size. if the author can talk about the duration, it can make people get more warned about this issue

    ReplyDelete
  11. As someone who frequently uses wax melts, I was definitely shocked to read your blog post! I knew that they probably weren't healthy to directly inhale, but I had no idea that they literally create indoor pollution. I will most likely not be using mine again. I am curious about potential healthy alternatives for wax melts, such as using something like bee's wax with essential oils. I'll definitely be looking into it after reading this very informative blog post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment